Public Good - Te Iwi Whānui

  • Home
  • About us
    • About public good
    • Who is Behind Public Good?
    • Write for Public Good
    • Join us
      • Funding
  • Public Good Articles
  • Resources
    • Public Good Networks in NZ and around the world
  • Democracy
  • Events
    • Conference 2018
  • Sectors
    • Arts and Culture
    • Children
    • Education
      • Tertiary Education
    • Employment
    • Government
    • Health
    • Justice
    • Sustainable Business
    • The Economy
    • The Environment
  • Sex and Gender
You are here: Home / Women go missing in Stats NZ proposed approach to sex and gender identity data

10 August 2020 by Jan Rivers

Women go missing in Stats NZ proposed approach to sex and gender identity data

Stats New Zealand is holding a consultation which closes on 13 August on sex and gender identity and their collection in the census and across government. Surprisingly for such a large topic the proposed changes were not part of the 2019-2023 Statement of Strategic intent. The changes are proposals at this stage and may be changed based on the consultation.

The proposal is to change the data collection criteria for who is male or female from a standard based on sex (male or female) to one based on a gender identity (male, female or something else) i.e. from a system based on reality to one based on a belief or perception. It also proposes to stop the collection of sex data except where it is deemed essential. This is quite an extreme stance. It was only six years ago that the standard on gender identity was first developed. Six years later it is proposed that it replaces sex in most official statistics. Only a small proportion of the population thinks of themselves as having a gender identity. Everyone has a sex.

It is proposed that the use of gender identity will happen whenever sex data is not explicitly required. Stats NZ report that gender is “more relevant” than sex but do not say why. Sex will frequently be required in healthcare for example and will continue to be collected in the census. Moreover it is proposed that gender identity (ie commonly used by people who feel their birth sex does not match their feelings about who they are) will be renamed gender. This is confusing. Gender is a word with many existing meanings including as a synonym for the sexed meaning of who is a woman or man. It seems unlikely that most people think of gender in the way proposed to be adopted.

I think that the proposal is foolhardy when a reliable and stable data set – sex – already exists. The poor quality and confusion caused by this proposed method of data collection will impact everyone in New Zealand including, ironically, those who do believe in a gender identity.

During the consultation period I met the head of the team developing standards at Stats NZ. From this I learned that the basis for the calculation of pay equity data has been altered since 2018 (page 9 says “employees should be included as the gender they choose”) to include transgender women as women based on their self-identification. The recent reporting on the Public Service gender pay gap for 2019 has shown an unusually large improvement. It fell from 12.2% in 2018 to 10.5% in 2019 – the “:biggest drop ever recorded”. Whether or not the impacts of including people by gender are material, this change preceeded the consultation. StatsNZ, the State Services Commission and the Ministry for Women pre-empted the consultation despite pay data being one of the most important datasets for measuring equity issues between men and women. We will never know now, of course, but if a part of the recent improvement was due to male people identifying as women, does that really represent a success for women? We now have “50% public service senior managers who are women”. Or do we? No-one can really know.

The legal basis for the proposed change is also questionable. In early 2019 the government deferred the Births, Deaths, Marriages and Relationships Registration Bill because it had not properly consulted on the Bill. Stats NZ’s proposed changes go against this by proposing to collect statistics on self-identified gender identity as if self-identification were enacted in law. Stats NZ, as well as other agencies – the Ministry of Social Development, Human Rights Commission, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Ministry for Women and more appear to have continued to implement self-identification under the radar before and after the deferral of the Bill. The changes have been mostly covert but there is increasing evidence that they are happening. The legal implications and unintended consequences for women of doing this do not appear to have not been considered.

There is little information about how StatsNZ are mitigating risks to accuracy of data by replacing gender identity with sex and it appears that there is little post implementation research on the impacts of this approach in other jurisdictions that are being relied on as models to implement this model of data collection.

The consultation relies on Canadian and UK examples as best practice but both these countries are facing strong opposition and mounting problems arising from their decisions. In Canada the law does supports self-identified gender so the situation is different to NZ. However the impact assessment for the law change was never released. Legal cases are showing how unrealistic allowing men unfettered rights to self-identify as women has been. In the UK statisticians and social scientists have been forced to use the media to draw attention to a similar decision related to census data and opposition to the approach is growing.

There is particular concern that many people and organisations will be unwilling to make their views on this topic known in an environment hostile to women’s interests. Recently the Public Service Commission told public servants they should be using their pronouns in emails and announcing them in meetings `so that it “signals you as an LGBTQIA+ ally”. Meanwhile the Stats NZ advisory group for the sex and gender identity work is largely (if not entirely) composed entirely of people advocating for prioritising gender over sex. It is doubtful they will consider impacts to women or possible unintended consequences. The risk of an accusation of transphobia and its consequences is too high and has been enough to close down debate. J.K. Rowling, for example, has been attacked for months when she ventured to say that it is women who have periods. Rowling is wealthy but was attacked mercilessly in the media. Individuals who have supported her have been summarily sacked or forced to apologise. Speaking of the importance of the material reality of biology is sufficient to trigger an accusation of transphobia. Under these circumsances who will be willing to support retaining sex descriptors rather gender identity? It could appear foolhardy.

I’ve attached my full submission to the Stats NZ consultation process which develops out these and additional concerns more fully. Speak up for Women – the women’s rights group whose successful campaign against the Self-Identification legislation saw the bill deferred has added some additional analysis here

Filed Under: Uncategorised Tagged With: Democracy

Comments

  1. Sam Jewel says

    24 August 2020 at 8:27 pm

    really helpful

  2. Racheal says

    12 August 2020 at 12:55 am

    Really good Jan.

  3. Mandy says

    10 August 2020 at 6:42 pm

    Thanks so much for sharing this, Jan! Your efforts on behalf of NZ women are legendary. I can’t quite believe we have this level of policy capture in 2020. It seems as if we have travelled back in time to a place where beliefs have superseded evidence, reason and science.

hands around the world

Latest on Twitter

Public Good – Te Iwi Whānui Invitation: Family violence - working through a complex problem. - eepurl.com/g-pGBX

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Public Good – Te Iwi Whānui Invitation: Family violence - working through a complex problem. - eepurl.com/g7kMpn

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Public Good – Te Iwi Whānui Invitation: Family violence - working through a complex problem. - eepurl.com/gWiCsD

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Public Good – Te Iwi Whānui Invitation: Family violence - working through a complex problem. - eepurl.com/gDsUIb

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Invitation: Next Friday 26 July Family Violence: Working our way through a complex problem. at St ANdrew's on the Terrace Professor Dawn Elder & Dr Ben Gray from Otago Medical School Wgtn publicgood.org.nz/20…

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Public Good – Te Iwi Whānui Invitation: Family violence - working through a complex problem. - eepurl.com/gxvfAz

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Glad I've been reading @caitoz who from Australia & with no insider knowledge has been outlining the farce of Russiagate, She and others have some well earned praise. caitlinjohnstone.com…

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

A few last minute spaces if this sounds like you. Mindful people build the future. Starts Sunday 5.30 - 7.00 at St Andrew's on the Terrace in Wellington. Could there be societal impacts of widely adopted meditation? Could those impacts include you? scoop.co.nz/stories/…

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Public Good – Te Iwi Whānui Invitation to Education and Political Literacy in New Zealand - eepurl.com/gkvnkj

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

@AnneliseJoy @radionz a) its a news website - publicly funded addressing an issue about a bill that has been withdrawn b) to the right of the article there are more stories written from an uncritical pro trans view c) You are claiming fear,ignorance & hate? I don't see that. What are you seeing?

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Follow @PublicGoodANZ

Recent Facebook Posts

No recent Facebook posts to show

Latest on Facebook

Newsletter Sign-Up

What Public Good is about

  • For us public service encompasses all the people who contribute to community well-being. public good
  • Universal public services are one of the strongest weapons in the fight against inequality Public Services International
    Civil Society Statement on World Public Service Day 2015

Dig Deeper

Contacts

Authorised by Jan Rivers
Wellington 6012
New Zealand
Email
Text/Ph: 022 126 1839


Public Good Website by Rosemary Neave
Web2blog.co.nz

Join our Monthly Email List

givealittleGive a Little to support Public Good

Latest Comments

  • Prue Hyman on An Open Letter about Green Party MPs trying to prevent advocacy for women’s rights.
  • Glenda Gale on An Open Letter about Green Party MPs trying to prevent advocacy for women’s rights.

Copyright © 2023 · Executive Pro Theme on Genesis Framework