Public Good - Te Iwi Whānui

  • Home
  • About us
    • About public good
    • Who is Behind Public Good?
    • Write for Public Good
    • Join us
      • Funding
  • Public Good Articles
  • Resources
    • Public Good Networks in NZ and around the world
  • Democracy
  • Events
    • Conference 2018
  • Sectors
    • Arts and Culture
    • Children
    • Education
      • Tertiary Education
    • Employment
    • Government
    • Health
    • Justice
    • Sustainable Business
    • The Economy
    • The Environment
  • Jan Tinetti’s Millstone
You are here: Home / Democracy / Tools for exploring democracy at the NetHui conference

14 July 2014 by Jan Rivers

Tools for exploring democracy at the NetHui conference

The NetHui conference is a national taonga. Run and funded by Internet New Zealand each year it provides a 3 day intensive and open ended debate on issues related to the internet and web technology. The event is accessible and the cost is low and the attendees pretty diverse – ethnicity, age, relationship to technology and prosperity level. Topics range from surveillance to science and from privacy to sexual politics. It seems few topics are off the table and each year a good proportion of the conference content is decided by the participants both before and at the conference.

This year’s conference provided the same rich brew including 2 interesting models – both new to me – for thinking about the quality of democracy.

John Edwards on Lessig’s ‘Laws of the Internet’

The recently minted Privacy Commissioner John Edwards spoke about the possibility of forgetting in the internet society. The speech is well worth reading for its substance including a more forgiving attitude to past behaviour in an environment where privacy is less available to us than in the past. He used a model developed in an essay by called ‘The Laws of Cyberspace’ by Lawrence Lessig in the late 1990’s. Lessig’s proposed four variables that influence behaviour – laws, architecture, markets and mores or social norms.

example of policies to limit bicycle theft.

Controlling element Example Effect
Legislation Harsh sentences / big fines for stealing bikes. Fewer thefts
Markets Bicycle costs lowered and so theft confers little payback. Fewer thefts
Mores or social norms Bicycle theft is believed by all to be a heinous and despicable crime Fewer thefts
Architecture Public buildings are fitted with numerous points for securing bike padlocks Fewer thefts

 

Each of the factors are inter-related. Longer sentences or bigger fines could impact on social norms increasing the stigma of being a bicycle thief. Cutting the cost of owning a bicycle will likely reduce their attractiveness to thieves but may reduce the stigma of theft.

The electronic world’s significant difference to the physical world is worth a thought. Changing electronic ‘architecture’ is much less onerous and costly than changing physical architecture.

Nick Williamson on Levers of Civic Engagement in Whangarei

kamoplaceraceThe second model concerns what is required to encourage or discourage citizen engagement in public submissions. Nick Williamson identified the high cost in time and effort as the cause of low participation rates when he was a planner at Whangarei District Council. The annual plan document is dense and detailed. Reading it and understanding how to respond can be a time-consuming process. He and his team implemented a high speed, high participation exercise cramming into 5 action packed days work that usually extends over several months. Questions about the need for a supermarket, a town square and better parking were on the agenda. Using the local library, street based questionnaires and social media Williamson and his team developed a plan for Kamo, part of the Whangarei District. The Kamo Place Race used the kind of startup/agile methods sometimes used in proto-typing and launching web and IT initiatives. Williamson said that in this process

  • Council changed from being an arbiter to a facilitator of community discussion.
  • More people were willing to participate when the council is listening.
  • More people voted on whether Kamo should have a supermarket than on council elections.

The results showed some interesting and some counter-intuitive results. People were not much interested in more parking for the centre as most of them were local and arrived on foot. This contrasted with the views of high street retail businesses who thought that the lack of additional parking was a limiting factor in foot traffic to the retail centre.

The theory underlying this agile approach is expressed as an equation.

P+B+D >C

Which describes the relationship between

  • P = the probability that an action will change the outcome
  • B = the benefit to the individual of taking part
  • D = sense of civic duty and good will
  • C = the costs (both in time, $$ and effort of participating)

In plain language people will get involved in a consultation process when the time and cost involved is low compared with the possible benefits, there is a likelihood of influencing the outcome and their sense of civic duty and goodwill for the body canvassing for opinion is high enough. This idea and the thinking behind it goes back to a 1968 by William Riker and Peter Ordeshook titled the Calculus of Voting which was rediscovered and popularised in 2010 as “The three levers of civic engagement”.

The rapid data collection and agile approach showed interestingly that a much greater level of citizen engagement could be achieved at a lower cost than traditional documentation heavy, formal processes. This is a refreshing change to the usual view that more democracy is necessarily more costly. It’s ongoing success presupposes that elected officials see their role, at least in part, as facilitating and supporting community decision making rather than a heavy handed reliance on the concept of mandate.

Having taken the tiger of public engagement by the tail and succeeding let’s hope that the lessons are adopted and a similar if not more extensive process is run in future years. Nick will be presenting his work at the LGNZ 2014 conference and the work at Kamo has received significant international interest.

References

Net Hui conference 2014
www.nethui.org.nz
Internet New Zealand
https://internetnz.net.nz
John Edwards NetHui speech notes. The right to be forgotten.
http://www.privacy.org.nz/assets/Files/Speeches-presentations/Nethui-keynote-speech.pdf
Law of the internet: Lawrence Lessig: https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/works/lessig/laws_cyberspace.pdf
Kamo place race Facebook page with graphical consultation results.
https://www.facebook.com/kamoplacerace
Kamo Place Race Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7P-cKjihMfQ
A calculus of the Theory of Voting by William Riker and Peter Ordeshook 1968 Jstor
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1953324?uid=3738776&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21104486468553
The Three Levers of Civic Engagement by Anthea Watson Strong
https://medium.com/theli-st-medium/the-three-levers-of-civic-engagement-cde106b68523

 

 

Filed Under: Democracy

Comments

  1. Paul De Rungs says

    26 July 2014 at 9:38 am

    Great site. The laws of the Internet by Lawrence Lessig make compelling reading.

hands around the world

Latest on Twitter

Public Good – Te Iwi Whānui Invitation: Family violence - working through a complex problem. - eepurl.com/g-pGBX

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Public Good – Te Iwi Whānui Invitation: Family violence - working through a complex problem. - eepurl.com/g7kMpn

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Public Good – Te Iwi Whānui Invitation: Family violence - working through a complex problem. - eepurl.com/gWiCsD

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Public Good – Te Iwi Whānui Invitation: Family violence - working through a complex problem. - eepurl.com/gDsUIb

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Invitation: Next Friday 26 July Family Violence: Working our way through a complex problem. at St ANdrew's on the Terrace Professor Dawn Elder & Dr Ben Gray from Otago Medical School Wgtn publicgood.org.nz/20…

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Public Good – Te Iwi Whānui Invitation: Family violence - working through a complex problem. - eepurl.com/gxvfAz

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Glad I've been reading @caitoz who from Australia & with no insider knowledge has been outlining the farce of Russiagate, She and others have some well earned praise. caitlinjohnstone.com…

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

A few last minute spaces if this sounds like you. Mindful people build the future. Starts Sunday 5.30 - 7.00 at St Andrew's on the Terrace in Wellington. Could there be societal impacts of widely adopted meditation? Could those impacts include you? scoop.co.nz/stories/…

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Public Good – Te Iwi Whānui Invitation to Education and Political Literacy in New Zealand - eepurl.com/gkvnkj

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

@AnneliseJoy @radionz a) its a news website - publicly funded addressing an issue about a bill that has been withdrawn b) to the right of the article there are more stories written from an uncritical pro trans view c) You are claiming fear,ignorance & hate? I don't see that. What are you seeing?

From PublicGood-ANZ's Twitter

Follow @PublicGoodANZ

Recent Facebook Posts

No recent Facebook posts to show

Latest on Facebook

Newsletter Sign-Up

What Public Good is about

  • There is peace in dungeons, but is that enough to make dungeons desirable? Jean-Jacques Rousseau
    The Social Contract
  • For us public service encompasses all the people who contribute to community well-being. public good

Dig Deeper

Contacts

Authorised by Jan Rivers
Wellington 6012
New Zealand
Email
Text/Ph: 022 126 1839


Public Good Website by Rosemary Neave
Web2blog.co.nz

Join our Monthly Email List

givealittleGive a Little to support Public Good

Latest Comments

  • Katrina Biggs on The New Zealand Association of Counsellors capitulates to pressure from trans-activists
  • A Turlington on Jan Tinetti’s Millstone

Copyright © 2023 · Executive Pro Theme on Genesis Framework